The first time I
encountered 7 sage, I had about a week until I was scheduled to take my second
LSAT. They seemed to me a sort of Godsend—and they spoke in a language I took
to more readily than certain “Bibles” (more on this later). Anyway, I got
myself the logical reasoning supplement and tried to cram that entire piece of the course in. In
the end, I actually lost four or so points from where I had been testing until
then—better than my first official score, but still not what I expected. Was I
angry? Well, I was a little disappointed and kind of confused. Fortunately,
other post grad opportunities called me (I pursuing a masters in Israel—more on
that later too) and put me in a position to reapply to law school. LSAT take
three. Does it surprise you that I went straight to 7 sage for my third time’s
the charm? It shouldn't. A week was hardly a fair test run of Graeme and J.Y.’s
lovely prep program—and seeing as they've added a whole slew of frankly
impressive analytic features…
In the “first week” I took a practice test. My mind blowing
score? 150. Ouch? Not really—no. Considering 1) I didn't get to read, let alone
guess on, about twenty or thirty questions (never underestimate the power of
blind guessing), 2) I only remembered (sort of) how logic games work half way
through the games section, and 3) I didn't even really remember the names of
all the sections or even what all the sections were (was there one with
reading?), 150 is a pretty impressive score. I took the test with the mindset
of a complete and total novice—I basically started from negative infinity—and I
still managed a 150? I’m only in my second week, but I’m anticipating a full on
massacre of LSAT proportions. Cue baby fist.
This is a retroactive post (Haha, geddit? To all my Romney fans, I'm sorry for your loss. Eep. Not how I meant it.) The full on review is on its way so stay tuned!
0 comments :
Post a Comment